Vincent Chravalle’s recent Los Alamos Daily Post letter regarding gun control has been followed by a series of opinions on the subject including a scathing one by John Pawlak attacking National Rifle Association members. This elicited a response by Dee Alei, questioning Mr. Pawlak’s choice of tactics, insulting his opponents rather than attacking the quality of their ideas or lack thereof.
Rarely does anything rile up residents of Los Alamos to the point of replacing reason with vitriol; that one thing being roundabouts. But even during the most contentious roundabout hearings before the Transportation Board, which I chaired for most of those discussions, I can only think of one instance when a member of the audience loudly engaged in name calling (and to clarify, both of my parents are members of Homo sapiens). Therefore it surprised me when Mr. Pawlak forgot to secure his cannon before opening fire.
The pen is still mightier than the gun or sword, but regardless of the tool, one has to hit the target. The gun discussion in America stays heated, in part due to the continued carnage caused by the misuse of firearms and the response of outraged citizens to these events. Thus eliciting equally heated responses from those who never misuse a weapon but feel like they are being targeted for exercising what is by state and federal definition, a Constitutional right.
But regardless of how much we have heated up the discussion, the problems have all remained, as this past weekend’s events in and around Santa Barbara, Calif. remind us.